Entry tags:
2011-09-20
Entry tags:
My tweets
- Mon, 14:08: RT @oflynnexpress: Want a referendum on EU membership? Then sign this http://t.co/DzPzwFF6
- Mon, 14:22: RT @BBCLondonOnline: VIDEO: London club faces closure threat: The Ministry of Sound nightspot in Elephant and Castle says it is under... ...
- Mon, 17:44: BBC News - Private Eye: 50 years of famous front covers http://t.co/xArKpVsP << I should pay more attention to its covers each week.
- Mon, 17:46: New Scientist - Airport security may soon have a new way to check your ID: watching the way you walk http://t.co/Ypse3DMR
- Mon, 18:01: RT @RaynerSkyNews: How a BBC promotional kazoo once blown by Sarah Teather became the subject of a ham-fisted terror investigation. http ...
- Mon, 18:02: RT @tomfinn2: Video: Yemeni doctor appeals for international help http://t.co/lyXfUJ2I
- Mon, 18:03: RT @tomfinn2: Can barely describe what I'm seeing. Dead people everywhere. Even children.
- Mon, 18:03: RT @tomfinn2: Back in the field hospital, 17 fresh corpses lined up, 3 are soldiers. One's chest is blown apart. Very heavy shelling aro ...
- Mon, 18:09: RT @tomfinn2: RT @kasinof: its official: Sanaa Airport is closed. It’s the first time this has happened since the uprising began #Yemen
- Mon, 18:26: Dirty laundry found in Gaddafi compound confirmed as British - http://t.co/h2ZvKNDo
Entry tags:
BBC Radio Four's The Moral Maze is possibly the best programme ever
Here's how Wikipedia describes it:
- "Four regular panellists discuss moral and ethical issues relating to a recent news story. The debate is often combative and guest witnesses may be cross-examined aggressively. The programme is hosted by Michael Buerk. The format is loosely based on the Select Committee procedure at the House of Westminster, in which invited guests on a particular topic of discussion are mercilessly grilled (often to the point of humiliation) by a regular (and carefully chosen) panel (such as the MPs on the Select Committee).
Michael Buerk delivers a no-holds-barred (often irreverent) preamble launching the topic, then introduces the first witness. In the ensuing interrogation, the witnesses are teasingly goaded into philosophically tripping themselves up (contradicting their own beliefs). Platitudes are quickly exposed for their fragility. Witnesses taken unawares by the incisive, unceremonious questioning, may then replace civility for discourteousness - usually when their arguments have been hit for six. When being briefed for their appearances, witnesses were encouraged to be as aggressive as you like."