mcgillianaire: (Bedouin in Desert)
mcgillianaire ([personal profile] mcgillianaire) wrote2006-08-25 05:40 am

Pluto relegated to the underworld

The International Astronomical Union has redefined our solar system by declaring Pluto to be a dwarf planet. As a result, there are now only 8 true planets & 3 newly-created dwarf planets.

Read More

[identity profile] pappubahry.livejournal.com 2006-08-26 12:12 am (UTC)(link)
About time.

Though one of the astro PhD students thinks that Pluto should have stayed a planet, since you need it to explain perturbations in Neptune's orbit.

[identity profile] pappubahry.livejournal.com 2006-08-27 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
Imagine the universe is just the sun and Neptune. Essentially, Neptune orbits the sun in a slightly elliptical orbit. Now put the other planets in there. The gravity of the other planets perturb Neptune's orbit.

[identity profile] gpaciga.livejournal.com 2006-09-02 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
The fact that something perturb's a planet's orbit does not mean that that something should also be a planet. Everything in space perturbs everything else.

[identity profile] pappubahry.livejournal.com 2006-09-03 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
I agree that Pluto shouldn't be a planet, but I'll trust my astro friend when he says how influential various objects are in planetary orbits.

[identity profile] gpaciga.livejournal.com 2006-09-03 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying it's not influential, I'm just saying that that's not good criteria for being a planet. I'm in physics as well, by the way.