I don't think the chances were negligible in terms of getting close to all 10 wickets in a session.
I don't seem to recollect making any claims one way or another about a lesser number of wickets.

All 10 wickets, yes.
I got a different impression from this, but perhaps I misinterpreted it.

Well, it certainly didn't come across that way.
I shall strive to make my future statements on this blog more explicit in terms of what they claim.