H O'Commons - st Media b Government 0

Barry Gardiner: I rise simply to correct the assertion I made earlier that the Press Gallery was bereft. I have since noticed the not inconsiderable frame of one of the members of the press-I believe from the Jewish Chronicle-who-

Mr Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman entered the House with me in 1997, and he is aware of the normal custom that one does not refer to people outside the Chamber. I allowed a modest latitude for the hon. Member for Kettering (Mr Hollobone), because what he was saying was central to the thrust of the argument that he wished to develop, but to get into the business of identifying individual journalists is not good for the House, and it is probably not good for the egos of the journalists concerned either.

Mr Hollobone: I am grateful for your ruling, Mr Speaker. Should there be any members of the Press Gallery up there this evening, they should be commended on turning up, although as you know, the reputations of lots of members of the Press Gallery precedes them, whether they are here or not.

----

The MPs were discussing what I consider to be an important issue but as you can probably guess, it didn't receive much attention from the press. A troubling situation has developed in which ministers are making important government policy statements to the media first, instead of to their fellow Parliamentarians. It is a situation that is spiraling out of control. You might be wondering why this is significant.

Well for starters, the practice belittles the constitutional principle that ours is a representative parliamentary democracy, not a murdochracy or beebocracy. As such, and for better or for worse, the Members of Parliament are the elected representatives in whom we have vested our trust, to hold the government of its day to account for the decisions that it makes. The Commons should have the first opportunity to scrutinise executive policy by voicing the concerns of their constituents. The first place the media should hear of such important business is either from the Press Gallery or from live coverage of BBC Parliament. Any other forum is a ministerial media spin cop out.

But even if we ignore the constitution, there is no hiding from the ministerial code of conduct, policed by the Prime Minister. Paragraph 9.1 clearly states: "when Parliament is in session, the most important announcements of Government policy should be made in the first instance in Parliament". Unfortunately our current PM and his predecessors have failed to implement the code and in the short existence of the present government, there have already been a number of contraventions, most notably with the Queen's Speech. And where the current crop of ministers have at least chosen to apologise in the House, the previous government didn't even bother! Therefore a tougher regime of sanctions is necessary. I like the idea of a suspension. It's harsh, but it's high time Parliament clawed back control from the Executive. This is as good a place to start as any. And to support the campaign is a Mr John Bercow, the Speaker of the Commons.

India Then, India Now - A Twenty Year Perspective: TV and Communication

India has the world's most number of domestic TV news channels (over 200), which shouldn't come as much of a surprise given that the quarterly report (for Jan-Mar) from the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has revealed, that there are now 503 channels broadcasting in the country. This includes 147 pay channels distributed by 24 broadcasters. 18 new channels alone were added during the first three months of the year. Now contrast this picture with that of exactly twenty years ago. There was only one state-owned broadcaster for the entire country, the Indian equivalent of the Beeb, and therein ended the similarity. Doordarshan or DD for short (and lit. Faraway Vision) still exists and has vastly improved, but it has been largely overshadowed by its private rivals. Yet with only 21.3 million dwellings connected to DTH services, DD continues to perform an important public service to the 100+ million dwellings with access to TV.

India is also home to the world's second-most mobile phone users with latest figures (pdf) from TRAI revealing 636 million subscriptions (upto June). That still leaves out half the country, but consider that in June alone nearly 18 million new subscriptions were added. That's 600,000 a day! Twenty years ago mobile phones were unheard of in India. That's understandable. But you may find it hard to believe that there were only 5 million landline connections, with a further 20 million on waiting lists! As former UN stalwart, Shashi Tharoor MP put it:

"The government's indifferent attitude to the need to improve India's communications infrastructure was epitomized by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's communications minister, C.M. Stephen. In response to questions in Parliament decrying the rampant telephone breakdowns in the country he declared that telephones were a luxury, not a right, and that any Indian who was not satisfied with his telephone service could return his phone — since there was an eight-year waiting list of people..." (Excerpt from Jan 2007)

Unfortunately, Mr Stephen is no longer with us to witness the wireless revolution that has engulfed the nation. The growth has been staggering. Consider that even 10 years ago there were less than 10 million mobile subscribers, 160 million in September 2006 when Tharoor wrote his article, and 300 million exactly two years ago. Since then it has more than doubled and by some projections India will break the billion barrier by 2013. Tharoor describes how India's monthly growth of seven million in Sep 2006 had just overtaken China's for the first time. That was less than four years ago. It seems to be only a matter of time before India adds the equivalent of an Australia every month.

Both these changes happened because of the post-1991 economic liberalisation policies, that was itself a response to India's balance of payments crisis. The Finance Minister responsible for implementing the changes was a certain Manmohan Singh, who is of course now our Prime Minister. He is an unlikely politician and some like yours truly would argue that he is only in power because of Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress Party that they belong to. But I will admit that unlike other unlikely candidates propped up elsewhere in India, Mr Singh has been anything but a puppet. Moreover, his reputation precedes him. As a bureaucrat he has achieved just about everything an Indian economist can aspire to: an Oxford education, Governor of the central bank, Deputy Chairperson of the Planning Commission, Economic Advisor to the PM, Finance Minister and now the PM itself. Not bad for someone who has never been popularly elected to public office! :)