Not all ideals are unrealistic and I don't think the chances were negligible in terms of getting close to all 10 wickets in a session. All 10 wickets, yes.
>I was not making the claim that the statistical likelihood was equal to that of poverty being eliminated overnight; such a claim clearly would be ridiculous. Well, it certainly didn't come across that way.
>After that, I was primarily curious about whether anyone had kept records on wickets in sessions because it seemed like an interesting thing to keep tabs on. Knock on the right door and you'll get it. Google is not a good place to dig up cricketing statistics when you've already got databases like StatsGuru (http://stats.cricinfo.com/guru) going around.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2007-07-31 07:57 pm (UTC)>I was not making the claim that the statistical likelihood was equal to that of poverty being eliminated overnight; such a claim clearly would be ridiculous.
Well, it certainly didn't come across that way.
>After that, I was primarily curious about whether anyone had kept records on wickets in sessions because it seemed like an interesting thing to keep tabs on.
Knock on the right door and you'll get it. Google is not a good place to dig up cricketing statistics when you've already got databases like StatsGuru (http://stats.cricinfo.com/guru) going around.