Date: 2007-10-01 02:07 pm (UTC)
Intreshtin! I never thought of that being an issue. 68 WPM ± 1 would've been adequate for the job I've just been accepted to. The temp agency asked for 30 WPM and the employer asked for 50, presumably with 100% accuracy at either speed. I remember I could type close to 100 WPM with 100% accuracy a couple years ago but it might've just been the program. It's probably a sign of a drastic reduction in MSN chatting during said period and I blame that squarely on [livejournal.com profile] dubaiwalla and [livejournal.com profile] vingt! ;)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

mcgillianaire: (Default)
mcgillianaire

2025

S M T W T F S

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 09:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios