>Would it have been acceptable at 4/290 early on day 2? It was a rhetorical question. I don't think teams should always "play for stumps/an interval" but if you look at the shot he played, you'll understand why I ranted about it. It was not only a silly shot, but uncharacteristic of Shri Rahulji (regardless of the context). The context added to the frustration I felt at the time.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-01-16 04:32 pm (UTC)It was a rhetorical question. I don't think teams should always "play for stumps/an interval" but if you look at the shot he played, you'll understand why I ranted about it. It was not only a silly shot, but uncharacteristic of Shri Rahulji (regardless of the context). The context added to the frustration I felt at the time.