Most of the UK's
1911 Census went online yesterday, thanks to a challenge made under the Freedom of Information Act. Because the 1911 Census was not covered by The Census Act 1920, which required the closure of subsequent censuses for 100 years, the Information Commissioner ruled that access to it should be given, (though personally sensitive information, such as
"details of infirmity or other health-related information" will not be released until 2012). What it does mean is that of the 36 million people living in the UK nearly 100 years ago, more than 28 million of their records are now publicly available ... but at a price if you want their full details. I was rather disappointed with the Pay As You Go bit but nevertheless, it is a wonderful database of information open to public mining.
So far there hasn't been a repeat of the mass invasion that forced the closure of the
1901 census website barely days after it was released in 2002. The overwhelming demand of 1.2 million requests an hour forced the withdrawal of the website five days after its launch, only to be reopened seven months later. To avoid such trouble, the organisers have prepared 26 servers, five times more than the ones prepared in 2002 to cope with the 300% increase in peak demand traffic expected this time around.
Naturally, the mass media have concentrated their focus on
celebrity ancestors, in particular
Amy Winehouse (whose paternal ancestors were Russian immigrants settled in Spitalfields in the East End),
David Beckham (whose great^4-grandfather, John Beckham, was employed by a London borough council as a
'scavenger' to go through people’s rubbish looking for objects of value. His son was a cart/van driver),
Kate Moss,
Virginia Woolf (who was still unmarried and known as Adeline Virginia Stephen at the time. She described herself as a journalist) and even secret suffragettes who refused to be counted.
The Times reported one suffragette as having written:
"If I am intelligent enough to fill in this paper, I am intelligent enough to put a cross on a voting paper."So you may ask, what relevance does this Census have for me? My family only moved here in 1980 but I've found some uses for it. For example I have confirmed that in 1911, the only person living on my street was someone in number 23. Now remember that guy Jack I made a post about a week ago? Well guess what? His family has lived in number 23 since it was built in 1900, so his claim that he is the street's oldest remaining resident is most certainly true. I also looked up how many people from the Slade family were living in my parish and district at the time and there were nearly fifty of them. (Read
earlier post to understand why I've mentioned that family in particular). I've also been trying to trace the roots of some of my friends from the North-East but to no avail so far. How irritating it is you have to pay 3-quid a pop just to see each entry's entire details. I wonder if The National Archives had provided the service themselves, instead of selling a contract to an external organisation, they'd've provided the entire database for free?
In any case I've spent sometime exploring how many people with South Asian surnames were reportedly living in the UK in 1911:
RAMANATHAN - 1 (a 25-year-old living in Prestwich, Lancashire - possibly in a cotton mill?)
Khan - 86
Singh - 43 (majority living in London but none in Hounslow or out there in West London)
Wadia - 14 (with ten of them living in Willesden, North West London)
Das - 13 (besides two pairs of brothers(?) in Fulham and Hampstead, the rest are dispersed all over the UK)
Shah - 10 (majority living in London with four (possibly brothers?) 21-to-26 year-olds in Kensington)
Rao - 9 (mainly based in London with three (possibly brothers?) 19-to-25 year-olds in Paddington)
Mehta - 9
Patel - 8 (how things have changed since then!!! there are now reputedly 200,000+ Patels living in the UK)
Pillay/i - 8
Gupta - 7
Gandhi - 6 (a family of four in Stoke-upon-Trent and judging by wife's name Eleanor, she was white)
Rahman - 6
Kapur - 5 (two young adults in Cambridge and two young adults in St Pancras, Central London)
Saklatvala - 4 (all four members of Shapurji Saklatvala's family when he was working for British Westinghouse)
Sharma - 4 (all but one living in London, two of them in Kensington)
Chopra - 3
Kumar - 3
Narayan - 3
Kaur - 2 (both living in the Isle of Wight, possibly with/related to the four Singhs living there as well)
Bannerjee - 2 (looks like a very young inter-racial couple living in St Pancras, London)
Chatterjee - 2
Rustomjee - 2
Cowasjee - 1
Pandit - 1
Chadha - 1 (Tiroji Harayan was 23 and living in Holborn, Central London)
Hodiwalla - 1
Malhotra - 1
Naoroji - 1
Krishna - 1 (23-year-old Raj was living in Lambeth, South London)
Rajan - 1 (a 17-year-old Ponnambala Thiaga possibly studying in Cambridge? Name is very Tamil)